[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241012071919.3726-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:49:04 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org (open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare(), as this is exactly
what this function does. Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify
error handling during probe.
Refactor the mutex handling in the rockchip_pcie_phy_init() function
to improve code readability and maintainability. The goto statement has
been removed, and the mutex_unlock call is now directly within the
conditional block.
Return the result of reset_control_assert() function, with 0 indicating
success and an error code indicating failure
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
---
v3:
Dan Carpenter: Reported below warning.
smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278 rockchip_pcie_phy_init() warn: missing error code 'err'
So refactor the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock and return the err code.
v2: Change the subject drop: Change to use/Use
v1: New patch in this series
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 34 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 51e636a1ce33..b5b1b1a667b2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -274,30 +274,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
- goto err_out;
-
- err = clk_prepare_enable(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&phy->dev, "Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n");
- goto err_refclk;
+ if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) {
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return 0;
}
err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
- goto err_reset;
+ rk_phy->init_cnt--;
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return err;
}
-err_out:
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- return 0;
-
-err_reset:
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-err_refclk:
- rk_phy->init_cnt--;
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -312,8 +301,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
goto err_init_cnt;
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-
err_init_cnt:
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
@@ -375,11 +362,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst),
"missing phy property for reset controller\n");
- rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get(dev, "refclk");
- if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) {
- dev_err(dev, "refclk not found.\n");
- return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- }
+ rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "refclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref),
+ "failed to get phyclk\n");
/* parse #phy-cells to see if it's legacy PHY model */
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#phy-cells", &phy_num))
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists