linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANAwSgS68sL2JE5wafq98gFV-jhWFx5594Ax6+aVW8mpiBgHnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:55:38 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks()
 function signature

Hi Manivannan,

Thanks for your review comments.

On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 at 11:50, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:36:05AM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Refactor the rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks function to accept a
> > struct rockchip_pcie pointer instead of a void pointer. This change
> > improves type safety and code readability by explicitly specifying
> > the expected data type.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> > ---
> > v7: None
> > v6: Fix the subject, add the missing () in the function name.
>
> Did you remove it in v7? Please don't do that, it just increases the burden on
> reviewers.
>
> - Mani
Earlier, it was reported that function () should be used in the function name.

Thanks

-Anand