[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f7eb380-08bb-4af9-b5cb-652538fdb215@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:36:32 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resource, kunit: add dependency on SPARSEMEM
On 10/11/24 20:43, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
>
>> On 10/9/24 23:40, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Hi, Guenter,
>>> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 9/23/24 18:21, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>>>> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/23/24 05:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Günter,
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:50 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Building allmodconfig images on systems with SPARSEMEM=n results in
>>>>>>>> the following message.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for GET_FREE_REGION
>>>>>>>> Depends on [n]: SPARSEMEM [=n]
>>>>>>>> Selected by [m]:
>>>>>>>> - RESOURCE_KUNIT_TEST [=m] && RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU [=y] && KUNIT [=m]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the build ultimately fails.
>>>>>>> Really? What's the build error?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I saw it on hexagon, and I didn't bother writing down the actual build error
>>>>>> message. But it turns out you are correct, the m68k machine does build with
>>>>>> CONFIG_RESOURCE_KUNIT_TEST=y even though SPARSEMEM and with it GET_FREE_REGION
>>>>>> are not set. Never mind, I don't really want or have time to argue. I'll just
>>>>>> disable CONFIG_RESOURCE_KUNIT_TEST when building hexagon images and wherever
>>>>>> else I see the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It does build for me on m68k, after fixing:
>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>>>>>>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ extern int mmap_rnd_compat_bits __read_mostly;
>>>>>>> # ifdef MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
>>>>>>> # define PHYSMEM_END ((1ULL << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1)
>>>>>>> # else
>>>>>>> -# define PHYSMEM_END (-1ULL)
>>>>>>> +# define PHYSMEM_END ((phys_addr_t)-1)
>>>>>>> # endif
>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>> After Linus' fix for PHYSMEM_END, GET_FREE_REGION doesn't need to
>>>>> depend
>>>>> on SPARSEMEM anymore. So, I think we can remove the dependency. Can
>>>>> you check whether the following patch work for you on top of latest
>>>>> upstream kernel (with Linus' fix).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It works for m68k. I'll run a complete test on all architectures/platforms
>>>> tonight.
>>> Does it work in the complete test?
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I dropped that one. Yes, it does.
>>
>
> Thanks a lot! Can I add your Tested-by in the formal version?
>
Sure, go ahead.
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists