[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d14275d-0b8e-d044-a436-a41251fa11f5@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:09:21 +0800
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@...weicloud.com>
To: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, kees@...nel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, ardb@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com, song@...nel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yeweihua4@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kallsyms: Fix wrong "big" kernel symbol type read from
procfs
On 2024/10/12 09:47, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:01:12 +0100
> Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 10:38:53PM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
>>> The root cause is that, after commit 73bbb94466fd ("kallsyms: support
>>> "big" kernel symbols"), ULEB128 was used to encode symbol name length.
>>> That is, for "big" kernel symbols of which name length is longer than
>>> 0x7f characters, the length info is encoded into 2 bytes.
>>
>> Technically, at least two. If we ever have a symbol larger than
>> 16kB, we'll use three bytes.
>
> Let's not worry about things that would not happen.
>
> scripts/kallsyms.c have a check to ensure that symbol names don't get
> longer than 0x3FFF.
Yes, so currently in kallsyms_expand_symbol() and get_symbol_offset(), the
symbol length are also assumed to be encoded into one byte or two bytes.
If considering the "longer than 0x3FFF" case, those two functions may should
also be changed.
>
> Best,
> Gary
>
>>
>>> +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c
>>> @@ -103,8 +103,11 @@ static char kallsyms_get_symbol_type(unsigned int off)
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> * Get just the first code, look it up in the token table,
>>> - * and return the first char from this token.
>>> + * and return the first char from this token. If MSB of length
>>> + * is 1, it is a "big" symbol, so needs an additional byte.
>>> */
>>> + if (kallsyms_names[off] & 0x80)
>>> + off++;
>>
>> So this "if" should be a "while" for maximum future proofing against the
>> day that we have a 16kB function ...
>>
--
Thanks,
Zheng Yejian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists