linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] iio: chemical: bme680: fix startup time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zwrdt_uaaLaVhM-L@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:36:07 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Vasileios Aoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	lars@...afoo.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, anshulusr@...il.com, gustavograzs@...il.com,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] iio: chemical: bme680: fix startup time

Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Vasileios Aoiridis kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 01:00:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:00:20PM +0200, vamoirid wrote:
> > > 
> > > According to datasheet's Section 1.1, Table 1, the startup time for the
> > > device is 2ms and not 5ms.
> > 
> > Fixes tag?
> 
> It is not affecting at all the operation of the driver so I was not sure
> if it was worth it to be backported to the previous versions. This is
> why I didn't put a fixes tag. You think for such a fix is necessary?

The commit message siggests that this is a fix. If you want to make it clear,
that it shouldn't be considered as a such, perhaps you need to rephrase it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko