[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241013.094829.1723074277269228254.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:48:29 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: gary@...yguo.net
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] rust: time: Introduce Delta type
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:56:52 +0100
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> wrote:
>> I'll use u64 for all in v3; The range is to u64::MAX in nanoseconds
>> for all the from_* functions.
>
> If you do, I'd recommend to call it `Duration` rather than `Delta`.
> `Delta` sounds to me that it can represent a negative delta, where
> `Duration` makes sense to be non-negative.
>
> And it also makes sense that `kernel::time::Duration` is the replacement
> of `core::time::Duration`.
Ok, `Duration` also works for me. I had kinda impression that it's
better not to use `Duration`.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists