[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=yW6rHSjRS_bDveeq+qm4xwitDLhP4KThQoQGXZzC8BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:48:04 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
tmgross@...ch.edu, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, anna-maria@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] rust: Add IO polling
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Seems that I misunderstood. The plan for the future layout is
> documented somewhere?
Not yet, but I think either would be fine.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists