lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014142713.yst257gxlijdxdw2@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:27:13 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] lib: packing: create __pack() and
 __unpack() variants without error checking

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:48:29AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> A future variant of the API, which works on arrays of packed_field
> structures, will make most of these checks redundant. The idea will be
> that we want to perform sanity checks only once at boot time, not once
> for every function call. So we need faster variants of pack() and
> unpack(), which assume that the input was pre-sanitized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---

All patches with an author different than the submitter must have the
submitter sign off on them as well.

Please do not resend without some reviewer activity first on the code
generation portion from patch 3/8, though.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ