[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014141243.902543910@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:20:12 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
patches@...ts.linux.dev,
"linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1 658/798] erofs: fix incorrect symlink detection in fast symlink
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
commit 9ed50b8231e37b1ae863f5dec8153b98d9f389b4 upstream.
Fast symlink can be used if the on-disk symlink data is stored
in the same block as the on-disk inode, so we don’t need to trigger
another I/O for symlink data. However, currently fs correction could be
reported _incorrectly_ if inode xattrs are too large.
In fact, these should be valid images although they cannot be handled as
fast symlinks.
Many thanks to Colin for reporting this!
Reported-by: Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>
Reported-by: https://honggfuzz.dev/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bb2dd430-7de0-47da-ae5b-82ab2dd4d945@app.fastmail.com
Fixes: 431339ba9042 ("staging: erofs: add inode operations")
[ Note that it's a runtime misbehavior instead of a security issue. ]
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909031911.1174718-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/erofs/inode.c | 20 ++++++--------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
@@ -212,12 +212,14 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct ino
unsigned int m_pofs)
{
struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode);
- unsigned int bsz = i_blocksize(inode);
+ loff_t off;
char *lnk;
- /* if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */
- if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE ||
- inode->i_size >= bsz || inode->i_size < 0) {
+ m_pofs += vi->xattr_isize;
+ /* check if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */
+ if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE || inode->i_size < 0 ||
+ check_add_overflow(m_pofs, inode->i_size, &off) ||
+ off > i_blocksize(inode)) {
inode->i_op = &erofs_symlink_iops;
return 0;
}
@@ -226,16 +228,6 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct ino
if (!lnk)
return -ENOMEM;
- m_pofs += vi->xattr_isize;
- /* inline symlink data shouldn't cross block boundary */
- if (m_pofs + inode->i_size > bsz) {
- kfree(lnk);
- erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
- "inline data cross block boundary @ nid %llu",
- vi->nid);
- DBG_BUGON(1);
- return -EFSCORRUPTED;
- }
memcpy(lnk, kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size);
lnk[inode->i_size] = '\0';
Powered by blists - more mailing lists