[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014-decorator-coma-bdaca54f459b@spud>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:41:19 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
pierre-henry.moussay@...rochip.com,
valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/11] riscv: dts: microchip: fix mailbox description
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 11:48:08AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> When the binding for the mailbox on PolarFire SoC was originally
> written, and later modified, mistakes were made - and the precise
> nature of the later modification should have been a giveaway, but alas
> I was naive at the time.
>
> A more correct modelling of the hardware is to use two syscons and have
> a single reg entry for the mailbox, containing the mailbox region. The
> two syscons contain the general control/status registers for the mailbox
> and the interrupt related registers respectively. The reason for two
> syscons is that the same mailbox is present on the non-SoC version of
> the FPGA, which has no interrupt controller, and the shared part of the
> rtl was unchanged between devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
> index 9883ca3554c50..f8a45e4f00a0d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
> @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ clkcfg: clkcfg@...02000 {
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> + sysreg_scb: syscon@...03000 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mpfs-sysreg-scb", "syscon";
> + reg = <0x0 0x20003000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + };
> +
> ccc_se: clock-controller@...10000 {
> compatible = "microchip,mpfs-ccc";
> reg = <0x0 0x38010000 0x0 0x1000>, <0x0 0x38020000 0x0 0x1000>,
> @@ -521,10 +526,14 @@ usb: usb@...01000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - mbox: mailbox@...20000 {
> + control_scb: syscon@...20000 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mpfs-control-scb", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> + reg = <0x0 0x37020000 0x0 0x100>;
It came up today that this 0x100 isn't correct - the actual size here is
4 KiB, so there's a zero missing.
> + };
> +
> + mbox: mailbox@...20800 {
> compatible = "microchip,mpfs-mailbox";
> - reg = <0x0 0x37020000 0x0 0x58>, <0x0 0x2000318C 0x0 0x40>,
> - <0x0 0x37020800 0x0 0x100>;
> + reg = <0x0 0x37020800 0x0 0x100>;
> interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> interrupts = <96>;
> #mbox-cells = <1>;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists