[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241014161109.2222-3-andreas@kemnade.info>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:11:08 +0200
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: twl: remove is_prepared
Remove is_prepared to simplify adding of TWL6030 support.
The default implementation should be enough.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk-twl.c | 17 -----------------
1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c b/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
index eab9d3c8ed8a..1d684b358401 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
@@ -77,26 +77,9 @@ static void twl6032_clks_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
dev_err(cinfo->dev, "clk unprepare failed\n");
}
-static int twl6032_clks_is_prepared(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct twl_clock_info *cinfo = to_twl_clks_info(hw);
- int val;
-
- val = twlclk_read(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE);
- if (val < 0) {
- dev_err(cinfo->dev, "clk read failed\n");
- return val;
- }
-
- val &= TWL6030_CFG_STATE_MASK;
-
- return val == TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON;
-}
-
static const struct clk_ops twl6032_clks_ops = {
.prepare = twl6032_clks_prepare,
.unprepare = twl6032_clks_unprepare,
- .is_prepared = twl6032_clks_is_prepared,
.recalc_rate = twl_clks_recalc_rate,
};
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists