[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014201515.463c7c07@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:15:15 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Olivier Moysan
<olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, Uwe Kleine-König
<ukleinek@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Marcelo
Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, Ivan Mikhaylov <fr0st61te@...il.com>,
Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@...rochip.com>, Dumitru Ceclan
<mitrutzceclan@...il.com>, João Paulo Gonçalves <joao.goncalves@...adex.com>, Alisa-Dariana Roman
<alisadariana@...il.com>, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>, Dragos Bogdan
<dragos.bogdan@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: adc: ad4851: add ad485x driver
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:14:27 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 12:40:40PM +0300, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> > Add support for the AD485X a fully buffered, 8-channel simultaneous
> > sampling, 16/20-bit, 1 MSPS data acquisition system (DAS) with
> > differential, wide common-mode range inputs.
>
> ...
>
> > +config AD4851
> > + tristate "Analog Device AD4851 DAS Driver"
> > + depends on SPI
> > + select REGMAP_SPI
> > + select IIO_BACKEND
> > + help
> > + Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices AD4851, AD4852,
> > + AD4853, AD4854, AD4855, AD4856, AD4857, AD4858, AD4858I high speed
> > + data acquisition system (DAS).
>
> I think I already commented on this... Anyway, it's much better to support when
> this list is broke down on per device per line. In such a case it's less churn
> if we need to remove or add an entry in the future.
>
> > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be
> > + called ad4851.
>
> Also, with all these devices to be supported why not ad485x as the name of
> the driver? Is it a preference by the IIO subsystem?
Don't. We've been bitten by too many cases of manufacturers noticing
a hole in their part numbers and 'slotting' something unrelated in.
So it just causes confusion. Hence strong preference for any new code
is pick a name from the list. The wild card also implies restrictions
that tend to break overtime when other part numbers outside the range
are used. Not using a wildcard keeps it consistently wrong so people
get used to it :)
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> linux/unaligned nowadays (I learnt it quite recently).
> (It requires v6.12-rc2).
Yup. That bit me in the IIO tree 3 times so far. I've
merged rc2 in for that reason.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists