[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f13c8c11-6fa3-480a-8035-6beb965fd01f@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:17:56 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio PĂ©rez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] virtio-mem: s390 support
On 14.10.24 20:56, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 04:46:12PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's finally add s390 support for virtio-mem; my last RFC was sent
>> 4 years ago, and a lot changed in the meantime.
>>
>> The latest QEMU series is available at [1], which contains some more
>> details and a usage example on s390 (last patch).
>>
>> There is not too much in here: The biggest part is querying a new diag(500)
>> STORAGE_LIMIT hypercall to obtain the proper "max_physmem_end".
>>
>> The last two patches are not strictly required but certainly nice-to-have.
>>
>> Note that -- in contrast to standby memory -- virtio-mem memory must be
>> configured to be automatically onlined as soon as hotplugged. The easiest
>> approach is using the "memhp_default_state=" kernel parameter or by using
>> proper udev rules. More details can be found at [2].
>>
>> I have reviving+upstreaming a systemd service to handle configuring
>> that on my todo list, but for some reason I keep getting distracted ...
>>
>> I tested various things, including:
>> * Various memory hotplug/hotunplug combinations
>> * Device hotplug/hotunplug
>> * /proc/iomem output
>> * reboot
>> * kexec
>> * kdump: make sure we don't hotplug memory
>>
>> One remaining work item is kdump support for virtio-mem memory. This will
>> be sent out separately once initial support landed.
>
> Besides the open kdump question, which I think is quite important, how
> is this supposed to go upstream?
MST suggested via the s390 tree in v1.
>
> This could go via s390, however in any case this needs reviews and/or
> Acks from kvm folks.
Yes, hoping there will be some review (there was some on the QEMU series).
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists