[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014-active-versatile-armadillo-717c4f-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:00:39 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] can: dev: add helper macros to setup an error
frame
On 14.10.2024 17:24:18, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> These helpers can prevent errors and code duplication when setting up a
> CAN error frame.
I personally don't like the ideas of using macros here. Is there a
reason not to use static inline functions?
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists