[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <v4c7vwoqfposhm3bxnidjzwb7via7flf2em45qbgjjncwfvv74@n2rsz3ujpdoc>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:29:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...s.st.com>, marex@...x.de, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: rng: add st,stm32mp25-rng support
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:41:41PM +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> clocks:
> - maxItems: 1
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + clock-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + items:
> + - const: core
> + - const: bus
>
> resets:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -57,6 +65,26 @@ allOf:
> properties:
> st,rng-lock-conf: false
>
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32-rng
> + - st,stm32mp13-rng
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> + clock-names: false
> + else:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
Missing clock-names constraint. They *always* go in sync with clocks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists