linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241014090638.GP77519@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:06:38 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, vladimir.oltean@....com,
	claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com, Frank.Li@....com,
	christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: enetc: add preliminary support for
 i.MX95 ENETC PF

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is very
> different from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI
> part. Therefore, the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95
> ENETC PF. So we developed the nxp-enetc4 driver for i.MX95 ENETC
> PF, and this driver will be used to support the ENETC PF with major
> revision 4 in the future.
> 
> Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission
> feature for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features
> will be added in the subsequent patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c

...

> +static void enetc4_pf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct enetc_si *si;
> +	struct enetc_pf *pf;
> +
> +	si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	pf = enetc_si_priv(si);

Hi Wei Fang,

pf is set but otherwise unused in this function.  So I think that it, and
the call to enetc_si_priv() should probably be removed. They can be added
back if and when they are needed in subsequent patches.

> +
> +	enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(si);
> +	enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
> +}

...