linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZwzgFTX7H35+6S9U@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:40:45 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
        Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting
 extsize

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:40:57AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:24:27PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > Extsize is allowed to be set on files with no data in it. For this,
> > > we were checking if the files have extents but missed to check if
> > > delayed extents were present. This patch adds that check.
> > > 
> > > While we are at it, also refactor this check into a helper since
> > > its used in some other places as well like xfs_inactive() or
> > > xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags()
> > > 
> > > **Without the patch (SUCCEEDS)**
> > > 
> > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > 
> > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > 
> > > **With the patch (FAILS as expected)**
> > > 
> > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > 
> > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR testfile: Invalid argument
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Looks good now,
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> 
> That said, could you add a fixes tag for the xfs_ioctl_setattr_*
> changes, please?

Hi Darrick,

Sure I'll send a new version. Thanks for the review!

Regards,
ojaswin