lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44GU=SR9MgBaXJi1yEbvg5Bb73FV4n8erGhN4s_qioKNCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:38:45 +0200
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rpmb: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:53 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
> ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().
>
> This is less verbose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> The ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove() API was close to be removed (see
> [1]). A usage has been re-introduced with this new driver :(
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1722853349.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/

I'm picking up this for v6.13. I guess your patch set now depends on
this patch. I can ack the patch instead and let you include it in your
patch set if it's more convenient. Please let me know what you prefer
to avoid potential conflicts.

Thanks,
Jens

> ---
>  drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c b/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c
> index bc68cde1a8bf..ad1b5c1a37fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void rpmb_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>         struct rpmb_dev *rdev = to_rpmb_dev(dev);
>
>         mutex_lock(&rpmb_mutex);
> -       ida_simple_remove(&rpmb_ida, rdev->id);
> +       ida_free(&rpmb_ida, rdev->id);
>         mutex_unlock(&rpmb_mutex);
>         kfree(rdev->descr.dev_id);
>         kfree(rdev);
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct rpmb_dev *rpmb_dev_register(struct device *dev,
>         }
>
>         mutex_lock(&rpmb_mutex);
> -       ret = ida_simple_get(&rpmb_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       ret = ida_alloc(&rpmb_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
>         mutex_unlock(&rpmb_mutex);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 goto err_free_dev_id;
> --
> 2.46.2
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ