linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241014031057.8199-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:10:55 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de,
	vschneid@...hat.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org,
	surenb@...gle.com
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled

sched_clock_irqtime may be disabled due to the clock source, in which case
IRQ time should not be accounted. Let's add a conditional check to avoid
unnecessary logic.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b6cc1cf499d6..8b633a14a60f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -735,29 +735,31 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 	s64 __maybe_unused steal = 0, irq_delta = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
-	irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+	if (static_branch_likely(&sched_clock_irqtime)) {
+		irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
 
-	/*
-	 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
-	 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
-	 * {soft,}IRQ region.
-	 *
-	 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
-	 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
-	 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
-	 * monotonic.
-	 *
-	 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
-	 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
-	 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
-	 * atomic ops.
-	 */
-	if (irq_delta > delta)
-		irq_delta = delta;
+		/*
+		 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
+		 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
+		 * {soft,}IRQ region.
+		 *
+		 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
+		 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
+		 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
+		 * monotonic.
+		 *
+		 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
+		 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
+		 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
+		 * atomic ops.
+		 */
+		if (irq_delta > delta)
+			irq_delta = delta;
 
-	rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
-	delta -= irq_delta;
-	delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+		rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
+		delta -= irq_delta;
+		delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+	}
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
 	if (static_key_false((&paravirt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
-- 
2.43.5