[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87da3d70-5906-4778-bba9-c5df26ae8e02@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:00:18 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm: Override default caching mode for SEV-SNP and
TDX
On 15.10.24 15:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 06:14:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 10/15/24 03:12, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>>>
>>>> + /* Set WB as the default cache mode for SEV-SNP and TDX */
>>>> + mtrr_overwrite_state(NULL, 0, MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK);
>>>
>>> Do you really want to do this for _all_ KVM guests?
>>>
>>> I'd expect this call to be conditional on TDX or SEV-SNP.
>>
>> I was confused by this as well.
>>
>> Shouldn't mtrr_overwrite_state() be named something more like:
>>
>> guest_force_mtrr_state()
>>
>> or something?
>>
>> The mtrr_overwrite_state() comment is pretty good, but it looks quite
>> confusing from the caller.
>
> I can submit a following up patch with rename if it is fine.
>
Fine with me.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3684 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists