[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241015145234.GRZw6BsqnIbaGWMzG_@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:52:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: York Sun <york.sun@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Ye Li <ye.li@....com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] EDAC/fsl_ddr: Add support for i.MX9 DDR controller
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:31:33AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
>
> Add support for the i.MX9 DDR controller, which has different register
> offsets and some function changes compared to the existing fsl_ddr
> controller. The ECC and error injection functions are almost the same, so
> update and reuse the driver for i.MX9. A special type 'TYPE_IMX9' is added
> specifically for the i.MX9 controller to distinguish the differences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.h | 10 +++++++++
> drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
checking file drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 31.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 442 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 478 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 492 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 520 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 550 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 577 (offset 4 lines).
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED
checking file drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.h
Hunk #3 FAILED at 71.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
checking file drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c
What tree have you created your patches against?
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> index ccc13c2adfd6f..3e4c2869a07cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> @@ -31,16 +31,28 @@
>
> static int edac_mc_idx;
I see here:
|static int edac_mc_idx;
|
|static u32 orig_ddr_err_disable;
|static u32 orig_ddr_err_sbe;
|static bool little_endian;
|
|static inline u32 ddr_in32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off)
and you don't have those in your diff.
What's up?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists