linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for the SDIO card as wakeup source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:08:26 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: haibo.chen@....com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, imx@...ts.linux.dev, haibo.chen@....com,
	shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	festevam@...il.com, s32@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for
 the SDIO card as wakeup source

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on shawnguo/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241014]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/haibo-chen-nxp-com/mmc-sdhci-export-APIs-for-sdhci-irq-wakeup/20241014-140300
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014060130.1162629-4-haibo.chen%40nxp.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: save tuning value for the SDIO card as wakeup source
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410150906.OEI0jyKN-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1592:13: warning: 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    1592 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(struct sdhci_host *host)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1569:13: warning: 'sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
    1569 | static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(struct sdhci_host *host)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore +1592 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c

  1568	
> 1569	static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(struct sdhci_host *host)
  1570	{
  1571		struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
  1572		struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
  1573		u32 reg;
  1574	
  1575		/*
  1576		 * SD/eMMC do not need this tuning save because it will re-init
  1577		 * after system resume back.
  1578		 * Here save the tuning delay value for SDIO device since it may
  1579		 * keep power during system PM. And for usdhc, only SDR50 and
  1580		 * SDR104 mode for SDIO devide need to do tuning, and need to
  1581		 * save/restore.
  1582		 */
  1583		if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50) |
  1584				(host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)) {
  1585			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
  1586			reg = (reg & ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_TAP_SEL_PRE_MASK) >>
  1587					ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_TAP_SEL_PRE_SHIFT;
  1588			imx_data->boarddata.saved_tuning_delay_cell = reg;
  1589		}
  1590	}
  1591	
> 1592	static void sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(struct sdhci_host *host)
  1593	{
  1594		struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
  1595		struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
  1596		u32 reg;
  1597	
  1598		if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50) |
  1599				(host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)) {
  1600			/*
  1601			 * restore the tuning delay value actually is a
  1602			 * manual tuning method, so clear the standard
  1603			 * tuning enable bit here. Will set back this
  1604			 * ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN in esdhc_reset_tuning()
  1605			 * when trigger re-tuning.
  1606			 */
  1607			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
  1608			reg &= ~ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN;
  1609			writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
  1610	
  1611			reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
  1612			reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
  1613			writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
  1614	
  1615			writel(imx_data->boarddata.saved_tuning_delay_cell <<
  1616					ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_DLY_CELL_SET_PRE_SHIFT,
  1617					host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
  1618		}
  1619	}
  1620	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki