lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zw6Zwn07it2MJwmD@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:35:14 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, vladimir.oltean@....com,
	claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com,
	christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as
 a separate module

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:58:34PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> enetc_pf_common.c provides the common interfaces for the PF drivers of
> ENETC v1 and v4. So it's better to make enetc_pf_common.c as a separate
> module in order to prepare to add support for ENETC v4 PF driver in
> subsequent patches.
>
> Because the ENETC of the two versions is different, so some hardware
> operations involved in these common interfaces will also be different,
> Therefore, struct enetc_pf_ops is added to register different hardware
> operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers.
>

Is it little better

Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
drivers.

look like this patch only add v1 ops?

> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> This patch is separated from v1 patch 5 ("net: enetc: add enetc-pf-common
> driver support"), only the changes to compile enetc_pf_common.c into a
> separated driver are kept.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig  |  9 ++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile |  5 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c   | 26 ++++++++--
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h   | 21 ++++++--
>  .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c         | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
>  5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> index 51d80ea959d4..fdd3ecbd1dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ config FSL_ENETC_CORE
>
>  	  If compiled as module (M), the module name is fsl-enetc-core.
>
> +config NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
> +	tristate "ENETC PF common functionality driver"
> +	help
> +	  This module supports common functionality between drivers of
> +	  different versions of NXP ENETC PF controllers.
> +
> +	  If compiled as module (M), the module name is nxp-enetc-pf-common.
> +
>  config FSL_ENETC
>  	tristate "ENETC PF driver"
>  	depends on PCI_MSI
> @@ -14,6 +22,7 @@ config FSL_ENETC
>  	select FSL_ENETC_CORE
>  	select FSL_ENETC_IERB
>  	select FSL_ENETC_MDIO
> +	select NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON
>  	select PHYLINK
>  	select PCS_LYNX
>  	select DIMLIB
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> index 39675e9ff39d..b81ca462e358 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> @@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_CORE) += fsl-enetc-core.o
>  fsl-enetc-core-y := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NXP_ENETC_PF_COMMON) += nxp-enetc-pf-common.o
> +nxp-enetc-pf-common-y := enetc_pf_common.o
> +
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
> -fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o enetc_pf_common.o
> +fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
>  fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
>  fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_QOS) += enetc_qos.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> index 3cdd149056f9..7522316ddfea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
>  #define ENETC_DRV_NAME_STR "ENETC PF driver"
>
> -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
> +static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)

Previous patch you remove static, this patch you add back. Is it neccessary
at prevous patch to remove static?

-static void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
+void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)

>  {
>  	u32 upper = __raw_readl(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR0(si));
>  	u16 lower = __raw_readw(hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr)
>  	put_unaligned_le16(lower, addr + 4);
>  }
>
> -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> -				   const u8 *addr)
> +static void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> +					  const u8 *addr)
>  {
>  	u32 upper = get_unaligned_le32(addr);
>  	u16 lower = get_unaligned_le16(addr + 4);
> @@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
>  	__raw_writew(lower, hw->port + ENETC_PSIPMAR1(si));
>  }
>
> +static struct phylink_pcs *enetc_pf_create_pcs(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> +					       struct mii_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	return lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc_pf_destroy_pcs(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> +{
> +	lynx_pcs_destroy(pcs);
> +}
> +
>  static void enetc_set_vlan_promisc(struct enetc_hw *hw, char si_map)
>  {
>  	u32 val = enetc_port_rd(hw, ENETC_PSIPVMR);
> @@ -970,6 +981,14 @@ static void enetc_psi_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
>  }
>
> +static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc_pf_ops = {
> +	.set_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr,
> +	.get_si_primary_mac = enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr,
> +	.create_pcs = enetc_pf_create_pcs,
> +	.destroy_pcs = enetc_pf_destroy_pcs,
> +	.enable_psfp = enetc_psfp_enable,
> +};
> +
>  static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  			  const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  {
> @@ -997,6 +1016,7 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
>  	pf->si = si;
>  	pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
> +	enetc_pf_ops_register(pf, &enetc_pf_ops);
>
>  	err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(node, pf);
>  	if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> index 92a26b09cf57..39db9d5c2e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ struct enetc_vf_state {
>  	enum enetc_vf_flags flags;
>  };
>
> +struct enetc_pf;
> +
> +struct enetc_pf_ops {
> +	void (*set_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, const u8 *addr);
> +	void (*get_si_primary_mac)(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
> +	struct phylink_pcs *(*create_pcs)(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct mii_bus *bus);
> +	void (*destroy_pcs)(struct phylink_pcs *pcs);
> +	int (*enable_psfp)(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> +};
> +
>  struct enetc_pf {
>  	struct enetc_si *si;
>  	int num_vfs; /* number of active VFs, after sriov_init */
> @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ struct enetc_pf {
>
>  	phy_interface_t if_mode;
>  	struct phylink_config phylink_config;
> +
> +	const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops;
>  };
>
>  #define phylink_to_enetc_pf(config) \
> @@ -59,9 +71,6 @@ int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
>  void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
>  void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16 *status);
>
> -void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8 *addr);
> -void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> -				   const u8 *addr);
>  int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
>  int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf);
>  void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> @@ -71,3 +80,9 @@ void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
>  int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
>  			 const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
>  void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
> +
> +static inline void enetc_pf_ops_register(struct enetc_pf *pf,
> +					 const struct enetc_pf_ops *ops)
> +{
> +	pf->ops = ops;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index be6aec19b1f3..2c6ce887f583 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -7,19 +7,37 @@
>
>  #include "enetc_pf.h"
>
> +static int enetc_set_si_hw_addr(struct enetc_pf *pf, int si, u8 *mac_addr)
> +{
> +	struct enetc_hw *hw = &pf->si->hw;
> +
> +	if (pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac)
> +		pf->ops->set_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
> +	else
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr)
>  {
>  	struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
>  	struct sockaddr *saddr = addr;
> +	int err;
>
>  	if (!is_valid_ether_addr(saddr->sa_data))
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>
> +	err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, 0, saddr->sa_data);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
>  	eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, saddr->sa_data);
> -	enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(&priv->si->hw, 0, saddr->sa_data);
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_set_mac_addr);
>
>  static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
>  				   int si)
> @@ -37,8 +55,8 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
>  	}
>
>  	/* (2) bootloader supplied MAC address */
> -	if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
> -		enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> +	if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr) && pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac)
> +		pf->ops->get_si_primary_mac(hw, si, mac_addr);
>
>  	/* (3) choose a random one */
>  	if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr)) {
> @@ -47,7 +65,9 @@ static int enetc_setup_mac_address(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf,
>  			 si, mac_addr);
>  	}
>
> -	enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(hw, si, mac_addr);
> +	err = enetc_set_si_hw_addr(pf, si, mac_addr);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -69,11 +89,13 @@ int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf *pf)
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_setup_mac_addresses);
>
>  void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>  			   const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops)
>  {
>  	struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
>
>  	SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &si->pdev->dev);
>  	priv->ndev = ndev;
> @@ -106,7 +128,8 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>  			     NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_RX_SG |
>  			     NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT_SG;
>
> -	if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && !enetc_psfp_enable(priv)) {
> +	if (si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_PSFP && pf->ops->enable_psfp &&
> +	    !pf->ops->enable_psfp(priv)) {
>  		priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_QCI;
>  		ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
>  		ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> @@ -115,6 +138,7 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>  	/* pick up primary MAC address from SI */
>  	enetc_load_primary_mac_addr(&si->hw, ndev);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_pf_netdev_setup);
>
>  static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
>  {
> @@ -161,6 +185,9 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>  	struct mii_bus *bus;
>  	int err;
>
> +	if (!pf->ops->create_pcs)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  	bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(*mdio_priv));
>  	if (!bus)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -183,7 +210,7 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>  		goto free_mdio_bus;
>  	}
>
> -	phylink_pcs = lynx_pcs_create_mdiodev(bus, 0);
> +	phylink_pcs = pf->ops->create_pcs(pf, bus);
>  	if (IS_ERR(phylink_pcs)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(phylink_pcs);
>  		dev_err(dev, "cannot create lynx pcs (%d)\n", err);
> @@ -204,8 +231,8 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>
>  static void enetc_imdio_remove(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>  {
> -	if (pf->pcs)
> -		lynx_pcs_destroy(pf->pcs);
> +	if (pf->pcs && pf->ops->destroy_pcs)
> +		pf->ops->destroy_pcs(pf->pcs);
>
>  	if (pf->imdio) {
>  		mdiobus_unregister(pf->imdio);
> @@ -245,12 +272,14 @@ int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node)
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_create);
>
>  void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf)
>  {
>  	enetc_mdio_remove(pf);
>  	enetc_imdio_remove(pf);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_mdiobus_destroy);
>
>  int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
>  			 const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops)
> @@ -287,8 +316,13 @@ int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node *node,
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_create);
>
>  void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
>  {
>  	phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_phylink_destroy);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NXP ENETC PF common functionality driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ