lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zw6aZiBvRM5hvqVn@tom-HP-ZBook-Fury-15-G7-Mobile-Workstation>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:37:58 +0200
From: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: ov5645: add HAS_EVENTS supporty

Hi Laurent,
Back on the topic.

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:16:13AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> Thanks for your review.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:54:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Tommaso,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 07:38:40PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > Controls can be exposed to userspace via a v4l-subdevX device, and
> > > userspace has to be able to subscribe to control events so that it is
> > > notified when the control changes value.
> > > Add missing HAS_EVENTS support: flag and .(un)subscribe_event().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> > > index 0c32bd2940ec..2c5145d5c616 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >  #include <linux/types.h>
> > >  #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> > > +#include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> > >  #include <media/v4l2-fwnode.h>
> > >  #include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> > >  
> > > @@ -1034,6 +1035,11 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops ov5645_video_ops = {
> > >  	.s_stream = ov5645_s_stream,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static const struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops ov5645_subdev_core_ops = {
> > > +	.subscribe_event = v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event,
> > > +	.unsubscribe_event = v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops ov5645_subdev_pad_ops = {
> > >  	.enum_mbus_code = ov5645_enum_mbus_code,
> > >  	.enum_frame_size = ov5645_enum_frame_size,
> > > @@ -1043,6 +1049,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops ov5645_subdev_pad_ops = {
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops ov5645_subdev_ops = {
> > > +	.core = &ov5645_subdev_core_ops,
> > >  	.video = &ov5645_video_ops,
> > >  	.pad = &ov5645_subdev_pad_ops,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1178,7 +1185,8 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >  
> > >  	v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov5645->sd, client, &ov5645_subdev_ops);
> > >  	ov5645->sd.internal_ops = &ov5645_internal_ops;
> > > -	ov5645->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> > > +	ov5645->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE |
> > > +			    V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
> > 
> > Instead of patching every subdev driver, should we handle all of this in
> > the subdev core ? If a control handler is set for the subdev, we could
> > set the HAS_EVENTS flag automatically, and default to
> > v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event() and v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe()
> > if there are no control operations.

Premit:
 - Don't know if I'm wrong eh.

This can be done into:

__v4l2_subdev_init_finalize()

Adding:

	if (sd->ctrl_handler)
		sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;

And check if there are no control operations using:

bool has_subscribe_event;
bool has_unsubscribe_event;


has_subscribe_event = v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, subscribe_event);
has_unsubscribe_event = v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, unsubscribe_event);

if (!has_subscribe_event)
	assign v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event as default .subscribe ops(somehow)

if (!has_unsubscribe_event)
	assign v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe as default .unsubscribe ops (somehow)


Or maybe v4l2_subdev_init_finalize() it's too late?
I'm completely wrong? What do you think?

Thanks in advance,
Tommaso

> 
> Well :)
> Not every subdev drivers, but only the ones I'm testing.
> 
> Yesterday I was playing with ov5645 :) And I got:
> 
> v4l2-compliance -d /dev/v4l-subdev1
> 
> test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: OK
> fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(1108): subscribe event for control 'User Controls' failed
> 
> Joke apart fully agree and thanks for your hint!
> I will take  a look :)
> 
> > 
> > >  	ov5645->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> > >  	ov5645->sd.dev = &client->dev;
> > >  	ov5645->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR;
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Laurent Pinchart
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Tommaso

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ