[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <252b6f39-3b06-43b7-b227-1c29c1c12bd5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:07:10 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"open list:PWM SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, justin.chen@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Document the
'open-drain' property
On 10/15/24 09:32, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:56:02PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Document the 'open-drain' property that allows configuring the PWM
>> controller outputs in open drain versus totem pole.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,bcm7038-pwm.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,bcm7038-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,bcm7038-pwm.yaml
>> index 119de3d7f9dd..12851c43a612 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,bcm7038-pwm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,bcm7038-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ properties:
>> clocks:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> + open-drain:
>> + type: boolean
>> + description:
>> + Configure the outputs with open-drain structure, if omitted totem pole
>> + structure is used.
>> +
>
> There's one other PWM with 'open-drain' so move the definition to
> pwm.yaml.
Ah indeed, there is one now, great.
>
> Alternatively, 'drive-open-drain' is a much more commonly used
> variation.
That name works just as well.
>
> Another thing to consider is for any PWM controller with more than
> 1 output, you might want this to be per output and therefore should be
> a flag in the cells.
Yes, that is a good point, this controller has two channels, so it seems
like increasing the #pwm-cells might be the way to go.
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists