[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Vs2bekyqBN_Lro_u32Dg9WM-bjDZr_tx-KyYH_toabVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:58:41 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:35 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * i2c_of_probe_simple_cleanup - Clean up and release resources for I2C OF prober simple helpers
> + * @dev: Pointer to the &struct device of the caller, only used for dev_printk() messages
> + * @data: Pointer to &struct i2c_of_probe_simple_ctx helper context.
> + *
> + * * If a regulator supply was found, disable that regulator and release it.
nit: was the double "*" starting the line above intentional?
Other than the nit, this looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists