[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f53523ff-1222-4fc0-9069-10ab895e1136@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:55:34 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
Cc: dpenkler@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gpib: Move free after the variable use has been
completed
On 10/15/24 16:48, Everest K.C. wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 4:35 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/15/24 15:51, Everest K.C. wrote:
>>> The variable `in_data` is freed, but used later in the code.
>>> Fix it by moving the freeing the memory after it use has been
>>> completed.
>>>
>>> This issue was reported by Coverity Scan.
>>> Report:
>>> CID 1600783: (#1 of 1): Use after free (USE_AFTER_FREE)
>>> 19. pass_freed_arg: Passing freed pointer in_data as an argument to
>>> ni_usb_dump_raw_block.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4e127de14fa7 ("staging: gpib: Add National Instruments USB GPIB driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/gpib/ni_usb/ni_usb_gpib.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/ni_usb/ni_usb_gpib.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/ni_usb/ni_usb_gpib.c
>>> index 1da263676f2a..75f39e1f3ed1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/ni_usb/ni_usb_gpib.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/ni_usb/ni_usb_gpib.c
>>> @@ -690,12 +690,12 @@ static int ni_usb_read(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size_t length,
>>> kfree(in_data);
>>> return parse_retval;
>>> }
>>> - kfree(in_data);
>>> if (actual_length != length - status.count) {
>>> pr_err("%s: actual_length=%i expected=%li\n",
>>> __func__, actual_length, (long)(length - status.count));
>>> ni_usb_dump_raw_block(in_data, usb_bytes_read);
>>> }
>>> + kfree(in_data);
>>> switch (status.error_code) {
>>> case NIUSB_NO_ERROR:
>>> retval = 0;
>>
>> Looks good to me. Isn't this on next though. Don't forget to
>> indicate it is against next.
> No, it was fixed in the linux-staging repo.
>> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>
Okay - by the way the same problem is in ni_usb_write_registers().
Did coverity catch that one?
Both problems could be fix in one patch - I will leave it up to the
maintainers to make a call on two patches or a single patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists