[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241015162227.4265d7b2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:22:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
johnstul@...ibm.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, jstultz@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/2] posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check
in pc_clock_settime()
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:33:02 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I'm guessing we can push this into 6.12-rc and the other patch into
> > net-next. I'll toss it into net on Monday unless someone objects.
>
> Can you folks please at least wait until the maintainers of the code in
> question had a look ?
You are literally quoting the text where I say I will wait 3 more days.
Unfortunately "until the maintainers respond" leads to waiting forever
50% of the time, and even when we cap at 3 working days we have 300
patches in the queue (292 right now, and I already spent 2 hours
reviewing today). Hope you understand.
Sorry if we applied too early, please review, I'll revert if it's no
good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists