[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241016082541.6d5d278d425e05b8295c0193@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:25:41 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Florent Revest
<revest@...omium.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 01/18] tracing: Use arch_ftrace_regs() for
ftrace_regs_*() macros
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:27:57 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> FYI, for anything to do with function hooks (fentry), the subject should be
> "ftrace:" not "tracing:".
Ah, yes.
>
> Tracing has to do with the tracing infrastructure, whereas ftrace is the
> function hook infrastructure.
>
> I just accepted the first two patches of this series and made the changes
> to the subjects.
OK, thanks!
>
> If a change is for function graph infrastructure specifically, you can use
> "fgraph:" instead.
Just to confirm, is "function_graph:" for function graph tracer itself?
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:28:43 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >
> > Since the arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs) is only valid when the
> > FL_SAVE_REGS is set, we need to use `&arch_ftrace_regs()->regs` for
> > ftrace_regs_*() APIs because those APIs are for ftrace_regs, not
> > complete pt_regs.
> >
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists