linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Documentation: s390-diag.rst: make diag500 a generic KVM hypercall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241015082148.7641-B-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:21:48 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Documentation: s390-diag.rst: make diag500 a
 generic KVM hypercall

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:16:20AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.10.24 10:12, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:35:27PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 14.10.24 20:04, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > "If only there would be a query subcode available, so that the program
> > check handling would not be necessary; but in particular my new subcode
> > is not worth adding it" :)
> > 
> > Anyway, I do not care too much.
> > 
> 
> Okay, I see your point: it would allow for removing the program check
> handling from the STORAGE LIMIT invocation.
> 
> ... if only we wouldn't need the exact same program check handling for the
> new query subfunction :P

Yeah yeah, but I think you got that this might help in the future.