| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ca3bb7c87a15ebb8e1284aa2da312cd00de49159.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:10:35 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>, David Lechner
<dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Olivier Moysan
<olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] iio: dac: adi-axi-dac: extend features
On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 10:57 +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> On 14.10.2024 16:14, David Lechner wrote:
> > On 10/14/24 5:08 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> > > From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > >
> > > Extend AXI-DAC backend with new features required to interface
> > > to the ad3552r DAC. Mainly, a new compatible string is added to
> > > support the ad3552r-axi DAC IP, very similar to the generic DAC
> > > IP but with some customizations to work with the ad3552r.
> > >
> > > Then, a serie of generic functions has been added to match with
> >
> > spelling: series
> >
> > > ad3552r needs. Function names has been kept generic as much as
> > > possible, to allow re-utilization from other frontend drivers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static int axi_dac_read_raw(struct iio_backend *back,
> > > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > > + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > > +{
> > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > + int err, reg;
> > > +
> > > + switch (mask) {
> > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_FREQUENCY:
> > > +
> > > + if (!st->info->has_dac_clk)
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * As from ad3552r AXI IP documentation,
> > > + * returning the SCLK depending on the stream mode.
> > > + */
> > > + err = regmap_read(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG, ®);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > +
> > > + if (reg & AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM)
> > > + *val = st->dac_clk_rate / 2;
> > > + else
> > > + *val = st->dac_clk_rate / 8;
> >
> > To get the DAC sample rate, we only care about the streaming mode
> > rate, so this should just always be / 2 and not / 8. Otherwise
> > the sampling_frequency attribute in the DAC driver will return
> > the wrong value when the buffer is not enabled. We never do buffered
> > writes without enabling streaming mode.
> >
> > > +
> > > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > + default:
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int axi_dac_bus_reg_write(struct iio_backend *back, u32 reg, u32 val,
> > > + size_t data_size)
> > > +{
> > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > + int ret;
> > > + u32 ival;
> > > +
> > > + if (data_size == sizeof(u16))
> > > + ival = FIELD_PREP(AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_DATA_16, val);
> > > + else
> > > + ival = FIELD_PREP(AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_DATA_8, val);
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_REG, ival);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Both REG_CNTRL_2 and AXI_DAC_CNTRL_DATA_WR need to know
> >
> > I'm guessing these got renamed. REG_CNTRL_2 = AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG
> > and AXI_DAC_CNTRL_DATA_WR = AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_REG?
> >
> > > + * the data size. So keeping data size control here only,
> > > + * since data size is mandatory for the current transfer.
> > > + * DDR state handled separately by specific backend calls,
> > > + * generally all raw register writes are SDR.
> > > + */
> > > + if (data_size == sizeof(u8))
> > > + ret = regmap_set_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SYMB_8B);
> > > + else
> > > + ret = regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SYMB_8B);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS,
> > > + FIELD_PREP(AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS,
> > > reg));
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(st->regmap,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG, ival,
> > > + ival &
> > > AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA,
> > > + 10, 100 * KILO);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> >
> > Should we also clear AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA on timeout
> > so that we don't leave things in a bad state?
> >
>
> just realized this poll is wrong and unuseful.
> It's a check on a bit we just set.
> Check must be done in AXI_MSK_BUSY of AXI_REG_UI_STATUS.
>
> If it fails after 100msecs, looks like things are seriously blocked,
> not sure clearing any bit would help.
>
>
> > > +
> > > + return regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA);
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - const unsigned int *expected_ver;
> > > struct axi_dac_state *st;
> > > void __iomem *base;
> > > unsigned int ver;
> > > @@ -566,15 +793,26 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (!st)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > - expected_ver = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > > - if (!expected_ver)
> > > + st->info = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > > + if (!st->info)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > > + clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "s_axi_aclk");
> >
> > This will break existing users that don't have clock-names
> > in the DT. It should be fine to leave it as NULL in which
> > case it will get the clock at index 0 in the clocks array
> > even if there is more than one clock.
> >
>
> mm, are there existing users except this hs driver right now ?
>
> Clock names are actually described in the example, and if missing,
> also retrieving "dac_clk" would fail.
>
There's already a frontend DAC using the generic DAC implementation. So, in theory,
yes... We can already have users not setting clock-names in DT that would now fail to
probe with this patch. David is only suggesting leaving this call to NULL. For
dac_clk we do need the *id in devm_clk_get_enabled().
Maybe it would also be worth mentioning in the bindings that s_axi_aclk needs to be
the first entry in clocks and clock-names for backward compatibility.
- Nuno Sá
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists