[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241015121637.GC32583@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:16:37 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, dchinner@...hat.com,
hch@....de, cem@...nel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, ritesh.list@...il.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:01:41AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
> we can only write a single FS block.
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> + if (ocount != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> + return -EINVAL;
Maybe throw in a comment here why we are currently limited to atomic
writes of exactly the file system block size and don't allow smaller
values.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists