[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241016115737.GC3559746@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:57:37 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
tabba@...gle.com, quic_eberman@...cinc.com, roypat@...zon.co.uk,
rientjes@...gle.com, fvdl@...gle.com, jthoughton@...gle.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, zhiquan1.li@...el.com,
fan.du@...el.com, jun.miao@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, erdemaktas@...gle.com, qperret@...gle.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org, shuah@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, bfoster@...hat.com, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
pvorel@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
anup@...infault.org, haibo1.xu@...el.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com,
pgonda@...gle.com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 26/39] KVM: guest_memfd: Track faultability within a
struct kvm_gmem_private
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:54:32PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Likely should be doable. All we need is the generalized concept of a folio
> with HVO, and a way to move these folios between owners (e.g.,
> global<->hugetlb, global<->guest_memfd).
+1
HVO seems to become a sticking point in these discussions, having a
way to make any big folio HVO optimized (and undo it) then put hugetlb
on top of that would be a nice refactoring.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists