[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb1a0381-05c3-4ef8-b6de-96824d587a7d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:13:33 +0200
From: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@...il.com>
To: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [v8,09/12] drm/msm/a6xx: Add traces for preemption
On 10/8/24 11:10 PM, Kees Bakker wrote:
> Op 03-10-2024 om 18:12 schreef Antonino Maniscalco:
>> Add trace points corresponding to preemption being triggered and being
>> completed for latency measurement purposes.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
>> Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on SM8650-QRD
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on SM8550-QRD
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on SM8450-HDK
>> Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/
>> drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> index
>> 21e333cb6342d33425eb96f97bcc853e9b041b36..6803d5af60cc8fb0f2a52ee160ffdbf0e8ef0209 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #include "a6xx_gpu.h"
>> #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h"
>> #include "msm_mmu.h"
>> +#include "msm_gpu_trace.h"
>> /*
>> * Try to transition the preemption state from old to new. Return
>> @@ -174,6 +175,8 @@ void a6xx_preempt_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> set_preempt_state(a6xx_gpu, PREEMPT_NONE);
>> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_irq(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Retrigger preemption to avoid a deadlock that might occur
>> when preemption
>> * is skipped due to it being already in flight when requested.
>> @@ -294,6 +297,9 @@ void a6xx_preempt_trigger(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> */
>> ring->restore_wptr = false;
>> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id,
>> + ring ? ring->id : -1);
>> +
> There is no need for the ternary operator. "ring" should be non-NULL,
> otherwise the code would have already crashed.
> So the change can just be
> trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id, ring->id);
You are right, we had a similar cleanup but I missed this particular
one, thanks for pointing me at it! I apologize for the late response but
I've been at XDC and therefore unable to look at my email. I will point
this out to Rob since this series is in msm-next to see if I need to
send a separate patch to clean this.
Best regards,
--
Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists