linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: shmem: update iocb->ki_pos directly to simplify tmpfs read logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <584e60dd-8a3b-46d5-87ec-aa7032d3a572@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:34:44 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<hughd@...gle.com>
CC: <willy@...radead.org>, <david@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: shmem: update iocb->ki_pos directly to simplify
 tmpfs read logic



On 2024/10/16 18:09, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Use iocb->ki_pos to check if the read bytes exceeds the file size and to
> calculate the bytes to be read can help simplify the code logic. Meanwhile,
> this is also a preparation for improving tmpfs large folios read performace
> in the following patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   mm/shmem.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 66eae800ffab..edab02a26aac 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -3106,26 +3106,18 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   	unsigned long offset;
>   	int error = 0;
>   	ssize_t retval = 0;
> -	loff_t *ppos = &iocb->ki_pos;
>   
> -	index = *ppos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	offset = *ppos & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +	index = iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;

index calculate could be moved before shmem_get_folio(), then...

> +	offset = iocb->ki_pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
>   
>   	for (;;) {
>   		struct folio *folio = NULL;
>   		struct page *page = NULL;
> -		pgoff_t end_index;
>   		unsigned long nr, ret;
> -		loff_t i_size = i_size_read(inode);
> +		loff_t end_offset, i_size = i_size_read(inode);
>   
> -		end_index = i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -		if (index > end_index)
> +		if (unlikely(iocb->ki_pos >= i_size))
>   			break;
> -		if (index == end_index) {
> -			nr = i_size & ~PAGE_MASK;
> -			if (nr <= offset)
> -				break;
> -		}
>   
>   		error = shmem_get_folio(inode, index, 0, &folio, SGP_READ);
>   		if (error) {
> @@ -3148,18 +3140,14 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   		 * We must evaluate after, since reads (unlike writes)
>   		 * are called without i_rwsem protection against truncate
>   		 */
> -		nr = PAGE_SIZE;
>   		i_size = i_size_read(inode);
> -		end_index = i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -		if (index == end_index) {
> -			nr = i_size & ~PAGE_MASK;
> -			if (nr <= offset) {
> -				if (folio)
> -					folio_put(folio);
> -				break;
> -			}
> +		if (unlikely(iocb->ki_pos >= i_size)) {
> +			if (folio)
> +				folio_put(folio);
> +			break;
>   		}
> -		nr -= offset;
> +		end_offset = min_t(loff_t, i_size, iocb->ki_pos + to->count);
> +		nr = min_t(loff_t, end_offset - iocb->ki_pos, PAGE_SIZE - offset);
>   
>   		if (folio) {
>   			/*
> @@ -3199,8 +3187,9 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   
>   		retval += ret;
>   		offset += ret;
> -		index += offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   		offset &= ~PAGE_MASK;
> +		iocb->ki_pos += ret;
> +		index = iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;

remove this line.

>   
>   		if (!iov_iter_count(to))
>   			break;
> @@ -3211,7 +3200,6 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   		cond_resched();
>   	}
>   
> -	*ppos = ((loff_t) index << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
>   	file_accessed(file);
>   	return retval ? retval : error;
>   }