lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <AM9P192MB13167529B6C73DC8686C2F86D7462@AM9P192MB1316.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:13:42 +0000
From: Joel GUITTET <jguittet.opensource@...ekio.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>, Jay Buddhabhatti
	<jay.buddhabhatti@....com>, Linux kernel regressions list
	<regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd
	<sboyd@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org"
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Bad commit backported on the v5.15.y branch ?

> Because it has a "Fixes:" tag on it.  Is that tag not correct?

understood why it's backported. Probably yes. Or maybe another commit should be introduced to not create a new issue.

> What "original message"?

My original message in this mailing list, see below commands that show the problem (last line is wrong):

cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_available_frequencies
299999 399999 599999 1199999

echo 399999 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed

cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_cur_freq
399999

cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_cur_freq
299999 ====> Should be 399999

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ