linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add Exynos990 pinctrl and chipid drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd9dfd85-0d9b-4759-9c56-5883a573a5ce@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:49:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Igor Belwon <igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
 tomasz.figa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add Exynos990 pinctrl and chipid drivers

On 16/10/2024 16:41, Igor Belwon wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:19:58 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/10/2024 09:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:04:45PM +0200, Igor Belwon wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> This series adds support for the drivers for the Exynos 990 SoC. It
>>>> consists of the pinctrl driver and the chipid driver. The product ID
>>>> of this chip for chipid is 0xe9830000. The pinctrl bank types are the
>>>> same as in the Exynos 850 chip.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>  - Moved bindings from SoC bringup commit
>>>>  - Moved device tree changes from SoC bringup commit
>>>>  - Ordered pinctrl nodes by unit address in SoC DT
>>>>  - Moved the exynos990-wakeup-eint binding to the correct if.
>>>
>> Moved? That's not what I asked for. Are you sure you have this warning
>> free? That's a requirement for Samsung (see maintainer profile).
>>
>> Ah, I see now what you did - you removed the interrupt. That's
>> surprising. I don't understand why.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> The interrupt was actually my oversight. This SoCs pin controller does
> not mux interrupts (much like E850 and Tensor). It's still compatible
> with the Exynos7 model as a fallback though.

OK, if this was conscious decision then looks fine. Mention this shortly
in respective commit msg and split the patchset so only pinctrl bits are
here.

Thanks for the work!

Best regards,
Krzysztof