lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3643b60-0c67-462b-b8c4-95854d2983b0@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:09:19 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Greg Marsden
 <greg.marsden@...cle.com>, Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@...e.com>,
 Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
 Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 21/57] sunrpc: Remove PAGE_SIZE compile-time
 constant assumption

On 16/10/2024 15:54, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 10:47 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 03:42:12PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> + Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton
>>>
>>> This was a rather tricky series to get the recipients correct for and my script
>>> did not realize that "supporter" was a pseudonym for "maintainer" so you were
>>> missed off the original post. Appologies!
>>>
>>> More context in cover letter:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014105514.3206191-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/10/2024 11:58, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>> To prepare for supporting boot-time page size selection, refactor code
>>>> to remove assumptions about PAGE_SIZE being compile-time constant. Code
>>>> intended to be equivalent when compile-time page size is active.
>>>>
>>>> Updated array sizes in various structs to contain enough entries for the
>>>> smallest supported page size.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> ***NOTE***
>>>> Any confused maintainers may want to read the cover note here for context:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014105514.3206191-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
>>>>
>>>>  include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h      | 8 +++++---
>>>>  include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h | 4 ++--
>>>>  include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h  | 2 +-
>>>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
>>>> index a7d0406b9ef59..dda44018b8f36 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
>>>> @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
>>>>   */
>>>>  #define RPCSVC_MAXPAGES		((RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD+PAGE_SIZE-1)/PAGE_SIZE \
>>>>  				+ 2 + 1)
>>>> +#define RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX	((RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD+PAGE_SIZE_MIN-1)/PAGE_SIZE_MIN \
>>>> +				+ 2 + 1)
>>
>> There is already a "MAX" in the name, so adding this new macro seems
>> superfluous to me. Can we get away with simply updating the
>> "RPCSVC_MAXPAGES" macro, instead of adding this new one?
>>
> 
> +1 that was my thinking too. This is mostly just used to size arrays,
> so we might as well just change the existing macro.

I agree, its not the prettiest. I was (incorrectly) assuming you would want to
continue to limit the number of actual pages at runtime based on the in-use page
size. That said, looking again at the code, RPCSVC_MAXPAGES never actually gets
used to dynamically allocate any memory. So I propose to just do the following:

#define RPCSVC_MAXPAGES		((RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD+PAGE_SIZE_MIN-1)/
						PAGE_SIZE_MIN + 2 + 1)

That will be 259 in practice (assuming PAGE_SIZE_MIN=4K).

> 
> With 64k pages we probably wouldn't need arrays as long as these will
> be. Fixing those array sizes to be settable at runtime though is not a
> trivial project though.

Indeed. Hopefully the above is sufficient.

Thanks for the review!
Ryan

> 
>>
>>>>  /*
>>>>   * The context of a single thread, including the request currently being
>>>> @@ -190,14 +192,14 @@ struct svc_rqst {
>>>>  	struct xdr_stream	rq_res_stream;
>>>>  	struct page		*rq_scratch_page;
>>>>  	struct xdr_buf		rq_res;
>>>> -	struct page		*rq_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES + 1];
>>>> +	struct page		*rq_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX + 1];
>>>>  	struct page *		*rq_respages;	/* points into rq_pages */
>>>>  	struct page *		*rq_next_page; /* next reply page to use */
>>>>  	struct page *		*rq_page_end;  /* one past the last page */
>>>>  
>>>>  	struct folio_batch	rq_fbatch;
>>>> -	struct kvec		rq_vec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES]; /* generally useful.. */
>>>> -	struct bio_vec		rq_bvec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];
>>>> +	struct kvec		rq_vec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX]; /* generally useful.. */
>>>> +	struct bio_vec		rq_bvec[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX];
>>>>  
>>>>  	__be32			rq_xid;		/* transmission id */
>>>>  	u32			rq_prog;	/* program number */
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>>>> index d33bab33099ab..7c6441e8d6f7a 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt {
>>>>  	struct svc_rdma_pcl	rc_reply_pcl;
>>>>  
>>>>  	unsigned int		rc_page_count;
>>>> -	struct page		*rc_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];
>>>> +	struct page		*rc_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX];
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>>  /*
>>>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ struct svc_rdma_send_ctxt {
>>>>  	void			*sc_xprt_buf;
>>>>  	int			sc_page_count;
>>>>  	int			sc_cur_sge_no;
>>>> -	struct page		*sc_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];
>>>> +	struct page		*sc_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX];
>>>>  	struct ib_sge		sc_sges[];
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
>>>> index 7c78ec6356b92..6c6bcc82685a3 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
>>>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct svc_sock {
>>>>  
>>>>  	struct completion	sk_handshake_done;
>>>>  
>>>> -	struct page *		sk_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES];	/* received data */
>>>> +	struct page *		sk_pages[RPCSVC_MAXPAGES_MAX];	/* received data */
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>>  static inline u32 svc_sock_reclen(struct svc_sock *svsk)
>>>
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ