[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XNZJ82e2rfMicAiXmxAx5hwydsnMVO8naaakRfroyNow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:34:01 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:49 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > Just commenting nits, so:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> I assume this stands even after Andy's suggestion to drop the gpiod check
> is applied.
Yeah, sounds fine.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists