[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZZeDyHJPZBuqnK1o+nWXgSAgNO7RceYB3Ao4tEOGRpDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 21:25:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Lewis Hanly <lewis.hanly@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 4/6] gpio: mpfs: add polarfire soc gpio support
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:56 AM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> I dunno if I'm making a mistake here, but I don't know if there's much
> value in implementing this suggestion - as far as I can tell only the
> get()/set() functions can be replaced by what's provided by gpio-mmio.c.
You're not making any mistake, you know the driver and hw better
than me.
Just skip the GPIO_MMIO if you think the result would look ugly.
You can add my:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists