[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cyjzaetd.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Geert
Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, Chris Paterson
<Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>, Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v4] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Fix missing put_device
On Wed, Oct 16 2024 at 11:38, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> But this change fixes a bug and that's it.
>
> Maybe.
Maybe?
There is no maybe. You clearly failed to read and understand the
documentation I asked you to read and understand.
Either you are impersonating a badly implemented LLM or you are actually
living in the delusion that you can teach people who are actually doing
work based on your particular flavor of hubris.
Your answer to this mail will clearly tell me into which category you
fall into, but neither of them are in any way useful to the Linux kernel
community.
Whatever the answer is, I don't care because your input is completely
irrelevant. You have proven that over the years.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists