[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241016060605.11359-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:36:05 +0530
From: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: Refactor looping in rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate
The previous implementation performs check for the band
in each iteration, which is unnecessary and further more
there is a else condition which will never get triggered,
since a check is done to see if the band is either 2G or
5G earlier and the band either be any of those 2. We can
refactor this by assigning a pointer to the appropriate
power offset array based on the band before the loop and
updating this.
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
index 37ef80c9091d..17d61f1d9257 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
@@ -1465,15 +1465,14 @@ static void rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
rate_num > RTW_RF_PATH_MAX))
return;
+ s8 (*tx_pwr_by_rate_offset) = (band == PHY_BANK_2G)
+ ? hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath]
+ : hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath];
+
for (i = 0; i < rate_num; i++) {
offset = pwr_by_rate[i];
rate = rates[i];
- if (band == PHY_BAND_2G)
- hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath][rate] = offset;
- else if (band == PHY_BAND_5G)
- hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset;
- else
- continue;
+ tx_pwr_by_rate_offset[rate] = offset;
}
}
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists