[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241016115741.785992f1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:57:41 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, Pablo Neira Ayuso
<pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: duplicate patches in the ipvs-next tree
Hi all,
The following commits are also in the netfilter-next tree as different
commits (but the same patches):
3478b99fc515 ("netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_trans_elem_alloc helper")
73e467915aab ("netfilter: nf_tables: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad")
0398cffb7459 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Fix percpu address space issues in nf_tables_api.c")
cb3d289366b0 ("netfilter: Make legacy configs user selectable")
These are commits
08e52cccae11 ("netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_trans_elem_alloc helper")
544dded8cb63 ("netfilter: nf_tables: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad")
0741f5559354 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Fix percpu address space issues in nf_tables_api.c")
6c959fd5e173 ("netfilter: Make legacy configs user selectable")
in the netfilter-next tree.
These have already caused an unnecessary conflict due to further commits
in the ipvs-next tree. Maybe you could share a stable branch?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists