[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zw9v-7B0e4fyEXxF@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:49:15 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...a.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Extend test fs_kfuncs to
cover security.bpf xattr names
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 01:54:08PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> Agreed that using security.bpf xattrs are better for this use case.
> In fact, this patchset adds the support for security.bpf xattrs.
> Support for user.* xattrs were added last year.
I think we'll need to revert it ASAP before it hits distros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists