[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241016081326.45277-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:13:26 +0800
From: lizhe.67@...edance.com
To: hch@...radead.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
lizhe.67@...edance.com,
longman@...hat.com,
mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] rwsem: introduce upgrade_read interface
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:03:33 -0700, hch@...radead.org wrote:
>> OK I know what you mean. It is indeed OK to remove "extern", but all function
>> declarations in the rwsem.h have the "extern" prefix. I think it would be
>> better to keep it consistent.
>
>They are pointless and should never be added.
OK I will remove it in v2. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists