linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/691] 5.15.168-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtTO8QbKEhggzOk-n+pBk5pEHenCfgs2RdQd=Ztsi+hnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:24:49 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/691] 5.15.168-rc1 review

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 17:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.168 release.
> There are 691 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:22:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.168-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

>From last week's regressions reports,
The LTP syscalls fanotify22 test failed (broken).
This regression is noticed on linux.6.10.y [1], linux.6.11.y, linux.6.6.y and
the Linus mainline and next master branch.

Now this has started failing on two additional branches linux.5.15.y and
linux.6.1.y.

 ltp-syscalls
  - fanotify22

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Anders bisected to patch
  b1a855f8a4fd ("ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors")
    [ Upstream commit d3476f3dad4ad68ae5f6b008ea6591d1520da5d8 ]

There is a fix discussed and posted in these upstream links,
  - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20241004221556.19222-1-jack@suse.cz/
  - https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2024-October/040433.html

The stable-rc 5.15.y (5.15.168-rc1)
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.167-692-g63cec7aeaef7/testrun/25456713/suite/ltp-syscalls/test/fanotify22/history/
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.167-692-g63cec7aeaef7/testrun/25456713/suite/ltp-syscalls/test/fanotify22/log
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.167-692-g63cec7aeaef7/testrun/25456713/suite/ltp-syscalls/test/fanotify22/details/

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CADYN=9KBXFJA1oU6KVJU66vcEej5p+6NcVYO0=SUrWW1nqJ8jQ@mail.gmail.com/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org