linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zw+JMMUOErRKqEH1@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:36:48 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@....com>
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, abelvesa@...nel.org,
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, ping.bai@....com,
	ye.li@....com, peng.fan@....com, aisheng.dong@....com,
	frank.li@....com, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver

On 24-10-14 11:24:35, Pengfei Li wrote:
> IMX93_CLK_END was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to indicate
> the number of clocks. However, it is not part of the ABI. For starters
> it does no really appear in DTS. But what's more important - new clocks
> are described later, which contradicts this define in binding header.
> So move this macro to clock driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> index c6a9bc8ecc1f..c8b65146e76e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>  
>  #include "clk.h"
>  
> +#define IMX93_CLK_END 202
> +

Sorry for this back and forth.

I've been discussing this off-list with Krzysztof and others and
now I think this is actually not wrong.

So:

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>

>  enum clk_sel {
>  	LOW_SPEED_IO_SEL,
>  	NON_IO_SEL,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>