linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] ACPI: GTDT: Tighten the check for the array of platform timer structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zw+O4nZisbkdvNtz@lpieralisi>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:01:06 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@...wei.com>
Cc: guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	maz@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ACPI: GTDT: Tighten the check for the array of
 platform timer structures

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:54:58PM +0800, Zheng Zengkai wrote:
> As suggested by Marc and Lorenzo, first we need to check whether the
> platform_timer entry pointer is within gtdt bounds (< gtdt_end) before
> de-referencing what it points at to detect the length of the platform
> timer struct and then check that the length of current platform_timer
> struct is also valid, i.e. the length is not zero and within gtdt_end.
> Now next_platform_timer() only checks against gtdt_end for the entry of
> subsequent platform timer without checking the length of it and will
> not report error if the check failed and the existing check in function
> acpi_gtdt_init() is also not enough.
> 
> Modify the for_each_platform_timer() iterator and use it combined with
> a dedicated check function platform_timer_valid() to do the check
> against table length (gtdt_end) for each element of platform timer
> array in function acpi_gtdt_init(), making sure that both their entry
> and length actually fit in the table.
> 
> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@...wei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - remove the tmp pointer to make the code more concise.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - based on Marc's patch and reuse the for_each_platform_timer() loop
> Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241015152602.184108-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com/
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Check against gtdt_end for both entry and len of each array element
> Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241012085343.6594-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com/
> 
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010144703.113728-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com/
> 
> Link to previous related patches:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241008082429.33646-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240930030716.179992-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com/
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
> index c0e77c1c8e09..d7c4e1b9915b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
> @@ -36,19 +36,25 @@ struct acpi_gtdt_descriptor {
>  
>  static struct acpi_gtdt_descriptor acpi_gtdt_desc __initdata;
>  
> -static inline __init void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
> +static __init bool platform_timer_valid(void *platform_timer)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
>  
> -	platform_timer += gh->length;
> -	if (platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end)
> -		return platform_timer;
> +	return (platform_timer >= (void *)(acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt + 1) &&
> +		platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end &&
> +		gh->length != 0 &&
> +		platform_timer + gh->length <= acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end);
> +}
> +
> +static __init void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
>  
> -	return NULL;
> +	return platform_timer + gh->length;
>  }
>  
>  #define for_each_platform_timer(_g)				\
> -	for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer; _g;	\
> +	for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer; platform_timer_valid(_g);\
>  	     _g = next_platform_timer(_g))
>  
>  static inline bool is_timer_block(void *platform_timer)
> @@ -157,6 +163,7 @@ int __init acpi_gtdt_init(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>  {
>  	void *platform_timer;
>  	struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt;
> +	int cnt = 0;
>  
>  	gtdt = container_of(table, struct acpi_table_gtdt, header);
>  	acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt = gtdt;
> @@ -176,12 +183,16 @@ int __init acpi_gtdt_init(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	platform_timer = (void *)gtdt + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
> -	if (platform_timer < (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
> +	acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = (void *)gtdt + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
> +	for_each_platform_timer(platform_timer)
> +		cnt++;
> +
> +	if (cnt != gtdt->platform_timer_count) {
> +		acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = NULL;
>  		pr_err(FW_BUG "invalid timer data.\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = platform_timer;
> +
>  	if (platform_timer_count)
>  		*platform_timer_count = gtdt->platform_timer_count;
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>