[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1729070461-13576-1-git-send-email-nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:21:01 +0900
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug: Add NUMA_NO_NODE check for node id
The acquired memory blocks for reserved may include blocks outside of
memory management. In this case, the nid variable is set to NUMA_NO_NODE
(-1), so an error occurs in node_set().
This adds a check using numa_valid_node() to numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug()
that skips node_set() when nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE.
Fixes: 87482708210f ("mm: introduce numa_memblks")
Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Suggested-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
---
mm/numa_memblks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
v2:
- Use numa_valid_node() instead of check.
- Add Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
- Update description.
- Drop RFC from subject.
diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index be52b93a9c58..a3877e9bc878 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
for_each_reserved_mem_region(mb_region) {
int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
- if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
+ if (numa_valid_node(nid))
node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists