linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/15] timers: Cleanup delay/sleep related mess

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <172917479725.89568.14288418643818666155.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:19:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, 
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, 
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, damon@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-mm@...ck.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, 
 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, 
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/15] timers: Cleanup delay/sleep related
 mess

On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:04:50 +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> a question about which sleeping function should be used in acpi_os_sleep()
> started a discussion and examination about the existing documentation and
> implementation of functions which insert a sleep/delay.
> 
> The result of the discussion was, that the documentation is outdated and
> the implemented fsleep() reflects the outdated documentation but doesn't
> help to reflect reality which in turns leads to the queue which covers the
> following things:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[11/15] regulator: core: Use fsleep() to get best sleep mechanism
        commit: f20669fbcf99d0e15e94fb50929bb1c41618e197

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark